[00:00:01]
HE REMEMBERS THAT GOAL SCORE ON YOU.ANYBODY ELSE? LOOKS LIKE GOT ONE.
MR.
I CALLED THE ORDER THE NOVEMBER 13TH, 2024 MEETING OF THE DESIRE REVIEW COMMITTEE.
OUR FIRST ITEM IS INTRODUCTIONS.
UM, THIS EVENING WE DO HAVE OUTSIDE COUNSEL ASSISTING US.
UH, PLEASE WELCOME MR. KYLE ELDRIDGE WITH SANS ANDERSON.
UH, IF YOU COULD PLEASE PROVIDE A BRIEF INTRODUCTION FOR MR. ELDRIDGE TO GET TO KNOW EVERYONE IN THE ROOM.
I GUESS JAY, WE CAN START WITH YOU.
I'M A PLANNER WITH THE UCHIN COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
WE JUST BEEN, I'M DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.
ASHLEY PARKER, DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE CLERK BACK FOR, UH, DESIGN REVIEW AT LARGE FORMAL PLANNING COMMISSION.
I'M REPRESENTING THE APPLICANT.
I'M THE APPLICANT, GOODIN COUNTY RESIDENT.
I'M JANINE HOFFER, UCHIN COUNTY RESIDENT CO-APPLICANT.
UH, BRETT HAMMONDS WITH BOWMAN.
COLIN JESSE, ALSO WITH BOWMAN.
JOHN WILSON, OUR DEV ARCHITECT PAUL COSTELLO DESIGN COMMITTEE.
UH, COREY DRIDGE, CHAIR OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE.
PATIENTS ARMS STRONG DESIGNER REVIEW COMMITTEE QUESTION.
SO CHAIR RESIGNATION, GO AHEAD TOO.
SO TONIGHT I AM STEPPING DOWN AS CHAIR.
I'D STILL, UM, WOULD LIKE TO BE, I THINK IT'S APPROVED TO STILL BE ON THE BOARD.
I JUST FEEL LIKE SOME THINGS ARE GOING ON NOW WHERE I CAN'T DO THE CHAIR THE WAY IT SHOULD BE DONE.
AND I'D RATHER RESIGN AND LET SOMEBODY ELSE DO IT THAN DO IT THAT WAY.
UM, AND THEN IF WE CAN OPEN THE FLOOR FOR, UM, NOMINATION OF THE CHAIR, I WOULD NOMINATE PAUL COSTELLO PLEASE.
MR. COSTELLO, TURN IT OVER TO YOU.
THANK THEY GET AND EVERYTHING.
YEAH, THANKS FOR HAVING ME ON CHIEF MEETING.
UM, OKAY, SO HAS EVERYONE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE IN THE MINUTES MINUTES? YES.
ON THE JULY 6TH SECOND MEAN IF SO, ANY COMMENTS OR IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE? I HAVE SOME COMMENTS.
UM, I CIRCLE, UM, INSTEAD OF EASTERN IT SAYS EASTER.
OH YEAH, IT'S ON PAGE THREE NEXT TO THE LAST PARAGRAPH.
EASTER IS SUPPOSED TO BE EASTER.
AND THEN PAUL, YOU'LL HAVE TO AGREE WITH THIS ON THE LAST PAGE, UM, I BELIEVE I WAS THE ONE THAT REQUESTED THE SIX FOOT FENCE BE EXTENDED TO ALIGN WITH WHERE THE BREAK WAS BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL AND THE COMMERCIAL AREA.
AND THEY CREDITED THAT TO YOU.
OTHER THAN THAT, I HAVE NO, SO IS THERE MOTION TO APPROVE WITH NEEDS ADJUSTMENTS? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
OUR NEXT ITEM IS THE SCHEDULED APPLICATION.
THIS EVENING WE HAVE AN APPLICATION BY, UM, JOHN AND JANINE HOFFER REQUESTING A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL COA FOR A MODIFICATION TO REQUIRE BUILDING SETBACK FROM PATTERSON AVENUE FOR OFFICE PROFESSIONAL USE ON TAX ABOUT NUMBER 63 1 0 180 B AND TAX ABOUT NUMBER 63 1 0 180 0.
THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT TWELVE NINE HUNDRED AND TWELVE NINE OH FOUR PATTERSON ON THE NORTH LINE OF PATTERSON AVENUE.
WITHIN THE ROUTE 6 6 50 PATTERSON AVENUE RIVER ROAD, OVERLAKE DISTRICT.
THE PROPERTIES ARE ZONED R THREE RESIDENTIAL GENERAL.
THE COA IS REQUIRED BY COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE SECTIONS 15,435 AND 15 444.
UH, MR. WHALEN WILL BEGIN WITH THE STAFF PRESENTATION.
THE PRESENTATION WILL BE FOLLOWED BY QUESTIONS AND THEN THE APPLICANT WILL RECEIVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK AND MAKE A PRESENTATION.
[00:05:01]
TO MEET YOU GUYS.SET THIS UP A LITTLE BIT SO I DON'T HAVE TO STAND SUPER AWKWARDLY.
I'M JOHN MICHAEL AGAIN, I'M GONNA JUST READ THROUGH THIS.
THIS IS A LITTLE QUICK, BUT WE'LL GET THROUGH IT TOGETHER.
UM, SO FOR ANY CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL, FOLLOWING ARE CONSIDERED PROPOSED STRUCTURE BUILDING COMPLIES WITH THE ENTRANCE CORRIDOR OR VILLAGE CENTER OVERLAY DISTRICT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.
UM, ALL EXTERIOR WALLS HAVE THE SAME OR ARCHITECTURALLY HARMONIOUS MATERIALS, COLOR, TEXTURE AND TREATMENTS.
UH, THE COMBINATION OF ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS PROPOSED FOR A STRUCTURE BUILDING OR IMPROVEMENT IN TERMS OF DESIGN LINE, MASS, DIMENSION, COLOR, MATERIAL, TEXTURE, LIGHTING, LANDSCAPING, ROOF LINE AND HEIGHT.
CONFORMED TO ACCEPTED ARCHITECTURAL PRINCIPLES FOR PERMANENT BUILDINGS REFLECTING THE CHARACTER OF THE APPLICABLE CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT AS CONTRASTED WITH ENGINEERING STANDARDS DESIGNED TO SATISFY SAFETY REQUIREMENTS.
UM, AND THEN THE LAST ONE, THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE BUILDING OR IMPROVEMENT IN TERMS OF DESIGN, MATERIAL, TEXTURE, COLOR, LIGHTING, LANDSCAPING, DIMENSION LINE MASS, ROOF LINE AND HEIGHT IS NOT DESIGNED TO SERVE PRIMARILY AS AN ADVERTISEMENT OR COMMERCIAL DISPLAY.
UM, AND DOES NOT EXHIBIT EXTERIOR CHARACTERISTICS LIKELY TO DETERIORATE RAPID RAPIDLY, UH, BE OF TEMPORARY OR SHORT TERM.
ARCHITECTURAL OR AESTHETIC ACCEPTABILITY OR OTHERWISE CONSTITUTE A REASONABLE FORESEEABLE DETRIMENT TO THE ATTRACTIVENESS AND STABILITY OF THE APPLICABLE ENTRANCE CORRIDOR OR DISTANCE.
UH, THIS IS THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PROCESS.
SO WE'RE HERE TO, UH, CONSIDER THE APPLICATIONS, UH, THAT HAVE BEEN APPEALED BY THE APPLICANT OR REFERRED BY STAFF.
UM, THE DRC MAY APPROVE OR DENY THE APPLICATION OR APPROVE THE APPLICATION WITH CONDITIONS, UH, REQUIRED FOR COMPLIANCE, INCLUDING CONDITIONS THAT DELEGATE APPROVAL AUTHORITY TO STAFF.
UM, THE DRC MAY RECOMMEND SUGGESTIONS TO ASSIST IN A RESUBMITTAL BASED ON WHAT THEY SEE.
UM, THE STAFF WILL REQUIRE APPLICANTS TO SUBMIT PLANS REFLECTING ANY CHANGES OR CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE DRC.
SO ANYTHING IN HERE TODAY, IF IT DOESN'T GET APPROVED OR IS GROUPED WITH CONDITIONS, WE WOULD GET THAT BACK FROM YOU, YOU KNOW, WITH, UH, WITH THE SUGGESTIONS THAT WERE GIVEN OR THE CONDITIONS.
AND THEN WE WOULD REVIEW THAT AGAIN.
UM, IN ORDER TO FOLLOW OR IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR REASONABLE EXPANSION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES AND TO ALLOW FLEXIBILITY AND THE APPLICATION OF THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO OVERLAY DISTRICTS, THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MAY GRANT REASONABLE DEVIATIONS FROM THE DESIGN STANDARDS.
IF THE SITE'S TOPOGRAPHY CONFIGURATION OR OTHER UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCE PREVENT FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS.
IN SUCH CASES, THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MAY IMPOSE CONDITIONS THAT WILL ACCOMPLISH THE PURPOSE OF THE REQUIREMENTS TO THE MAX MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL.
SO HERE IS, UM, THE INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROPERTY AS WE CALL THESE TWO PARCELS.
UM, IT'S IN THE SOUTHEASTERN PART OF THE COUNTY.
UM, THE APPLICATION TYPE IS A CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL.
UM, THE REQUEST IS RELIEF FROM THE OVERLAY DISTRICT SETBACK REQUIREMENT, UH, WHICH DIFFERS FROM THE BASE ZONING.
IT'S LOCATED AT 1290 PATTERSON AVENUE.
UH, IT'S IN THE ROUTE 6 6 50 OVERLAY.
UM, IT'S ALMOST EXACTLY TWO ACRES FOR BOTH OF THE LOTS.
THE CURRENT ZONINGS R THREE AND THE COMP.
THE COMP PLAN HAS IT AS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, A MEDIUM DENSITY.
AND SO WE HAVE A COUPLE MAPS COMING UP.
SO ON THE LEFT IS A VICINITY MAP IS ROUGHLY WHERE WE ARE.
UM, IT'S ALMOST RIGHT EXACTLY WHERE THAT ROUTE SIX SIGN IS, IF YOU CAN SEE THAT SMALL.
UM, ON THE RIGHT IS THE AERIAL PHOTO.
THIS IS THE EXISTING CONDITIONS.
UM, ON THE LEFT SIDE OR THE WESTERN SIDE IS THE BUILDING WHICH WILL BE IMPROVED UPON OR RENOVATED.
UM, ON THE RIGHT IS A VACANT BUILDING RIGHT NOW.
UM, YOU BOTH, YOU OWN BOTH OF THE PROPERTIES THAT ARE LISTED HERE.
UM, THE CURRENT REZONING IS ON THE LEFT.
UM, ABUTTING IT OR ADJACENT TO IT IS THE RO, WHICH IS CURRENTLY, IT'S THE CREEKMORE OFFICE PARK.
SO THIS USE EXISTS VERY NEARBY IN A WELL ESTABLISHED OFFICE PARK.
UM, AND THEN ON THE RIGHT HERE IS THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WHICH YOU CAN SEE CREEKMORE IS LISTED AS OFFICE BUT NOT RETAIL.
UM, AND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LISTED AS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
UM, THIS IS A SITE LAYOUT THAT WAS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
UM, I'VE HIGHLIGHTED THE SETBACKS AS THAT'S WHAT WE'RE FOCUSING ON IN THIS MEETING.
UM, THE R THREE BASE ZONING REQUIRES A HUNDRED FOOT SETBACK, WHICH THEY SHOW, AND IT'S THIS DASH LINE THAT GOES ACROSS.
UM, THE OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS ARE THE 125 FEET AND AS YOU CAN SEE, IT CUTS
[00:10:01]
THROUGH THE TOP HALF OF THEIR PROPOSED BUILDING.UM, THERE IS ONE PROPOSED ENTRANCE WHICH EXISTS CURRENTLY.
SO THE REQUEST, UH, FOR THE MODIFICATION TO SECTION 15 DASH 4 4 4 B ONE IS THE OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS THAT SPECIFICALLY SPEAK TO SETBACKS.
UM, THE CODE STATES THAT THE MINIMUM SETBACK, UH, FOR PATTERSON AVENUE AND RIVER, RIVER ROAD WEST WOULD BE 125 FEET.
UM, THAT IS REDUCED TO 75 FEET IF THEY'RE ABLE TO GET THE PARKING INTO THE REAR OF THE LOT.
UM, AND THEN THE GENERAL RIVER ROAD CORRIDOR WOULD BE A HUNDRED FEET.
AND IT'S IMPORTANT THAT THERE'S AN ASTERISK THAT IT'S MEASURED FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY.
IT'S NOT MEASURED FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE ROAD OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
SO JUST TO RECAP EVERYTHING, UH, THE BASE ZONING SETBACK REQUIREMENT FOR R THREE, WHICH IS THE CURRENT ZONING, UH, IS A HUNDRED FEET.
THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSED STRUCTURE AND THE EXISTING STRUCTURE MEETS THAT REQUIREMENT.
THE APPLICANT DOES NOT MEET THE 125 FOOT SETBACK REQUIREMENT SET UP BY THE LABOR DISTRICTS.
DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? THE QUESTION IS KIND OF FOR FUTURE DOWN THE ROAD MM-HMM
UM, ON THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY BEHIND CREEK BOARD IS RESIDENTIAL.
IF THERE WERE RESIDENTIAL EXTENDING BEYOND THE BACK OF THIS PROPERTY, HOW MUCH OF EMPTY SPACE OR BUFFER WOULD THERE BE BETWEEN THEIR BUILDING AND THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY? UM, I BELIEVE THAT ON THE SITE PLAN THEY HAVE LEFT SOME, A GOOD BIT OF SPACE.
THEY INTEND TO LEAVE THE EXISTING VEGETATION.
SO I'LL PROBABLY LET YOU ALL SHOW THAT A LITTLE BETTER.
YEAH, YOU CAN BACK IT UP FROM THE, TO THE AERIAL.
YEAH, YOU CAN PROBABLY SEE THE, THERE YOU GO.
UM, AND I CAN ADDRESS IT TOO IN OUR PORTION.
SO YOU CAN SEE WHERE CREEK MORE ON THE RIGHT OFFICE, NO RETAIL LABEL.
SO THAT RUNS BEHIND THE 12 900 PROFIT.
I COULD JUST, I CAN HIGHLIGHT ALSO WHAT WHAT OUR SETBACKS ARE AND THEN SHOW WHERE THE EXISTING LANDSCAPING IS TOO.
IN ADDITION TO THE CREEKMORE HAS A BUFFER TO ITS REAR.
SO THAT PORTION OF THE PINK AND THE BLUE ARE BUFFERED BEHIND IT.
BETWEEN THAT AND THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ON THE, ON THE OTHER SIDE.
AND YOU HAD MENTIONED IN TERMS OF THE DIFFERENT, UM, CRITERIA ABOUT HOW THINGS COME BEFORE THE COMMITTEE MM-HMM
THERE TWO WAYS THE STAFF RECOMMENDED IT MM-HMM
OR, OR AN APPEAL APPEAL BY THAT, HOW DID, HOW DID THIS COME TO THE COMMITTEE? UM, SO IT'S A GREAT QUESTION.
SO WE STARTED THIS PROCESS INITIALLY IN A REZONING ATTEMPT.
UM, AND THE REZONING COMMITTEE RUN BY, I BELIEVE RAY CASH KIND OF RUNS THAT COMMITTEE.
HE CAME BACK AND HE SAID, WELL, LET'S TRY TO GET YOU WITH THE DRC TO TALK ABOUT WHETHER WE CAN GET THIS SET BACK APPROVED.
'CAUSE WE NEED ABOUT 10 OR 15 FEET OR SO, KEEP THE EXISTING STRUCTURE OF OUR INTENT.
UM, SO THAT'S WHY WE WERE REFERRED TO THE DRC.
YEAH, WE HAD OUR INITIAL, UH, MEETING WITH THE, UM, REZONING COMMITTEE ON MARCH 20TH OF THIS YEAR.
AND SO EVER SINCE THEN, AND ANOTHER THING WAS WE ONLY OWN ONE PIECE OF PROPERTY AND THEY SAID ANOTHER SUGGESTION WOULD BE TO BUY THAT EASTERN PROPERTY SO YOU HAVE ENOUGH ROOM FOR PARKING.
AND SO OUR INTENT IS TO KEEP THAT NATURAL.
THERE'S ONE STRUCTURE, IT'S A D DECK AND DILATED STRUCTURE ON THAT LOCK.
SO OUR INTENT IS TO DEMO THAT AND JUST KEEP IT NATURAL THERE.
I THINK, YEAH, THAT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING TOO,
IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? UH, WHAT'S THE, UH, NORTHWEST CORNER SETBACK FROM THE PROPERTY LINE CURRENTLY ON THE DWELLING THAT IS PROPOSED TO BE IMPROVED? THEY PULL THE SITE UP 24 24 FEET.
AND THEN THE STRUCTURE THAT IS TO BE DEMOED, THAT IS OVER, IS THIS ONE THE EXISTING? THAT'S CORRECT.
AND THOSE ARE BEING KEPT AS TWO SEPARATE PARCELS? NO, THEY'LL BE, UH, BE VACATED.
AND SO THAT PROCESS IS UNDERWAY NOW AND THERE'S NO EXISTING PROPERTIES OR ANY OTHER CASES ON THIS PROPERTY.
SO IT'S CLEAN, THERE'S NO NEED TO AMEND ANYTHING.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT OR NO.
[00:15:08]
I MIGHT JUST, YEAH.IS IT WORKING WITH THE ARROWS? THERE WE GO.
WELL THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR TIME.
AGAIN, I'M JENNIFER MULLEN, UM, WITH ROCK JACKSON ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANTS WHO ARE ALSO HERE.
WE ALSO HAVE OUR ARCHITECTS AND OUR ENGINEERS IF THERE ARE ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS.
BUT THANK YOU FOR THE STAT PRESENTATION.
UM, THAT COVERED A LOT OF WHAT I WANTED TO TALK ABOUT.
SO I JUST WANNA HIGHLIGHT A FEW ITEMS. SO THIS OBVIOUSLY IS OUR, IS OUR LOCATION RIGHT NEXT TO, ON THE WEST IS RICHMOND COUNTRY CLUB.
AND THEN HERE IS THE, UM, CREEKMORE OFFICE CONDOMINIUMS. AND SO YOU CAN SEE IN THE NEXT SLIDE HERE, UM, IT COMES BEHIND IT, YOU KNOW, AS WE WERE JUST SHOWING ON THAT AREA.
SO THIS, THIS SECTION HERE IS STILL THE OFFICE CONDOMINIUMS, WHICH HAS A PROFFERED CONDITION FOR THE BUFFER TO ITS REAR.
UM, AND SO THE, THE NEW SITE PLAN, THIS JUST SHOWS THIS IS WHAT THE ZONING WOULD REQUIRE IF REZONED.
AND SO YOU'LL SEE IN THE AERIAL THERE'S MORE SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION THAT IS, THAT IS BACK HERE.
UM, AND ALL OF THE, THIS SECTION HERE IS THE EXISTING BUILDING ITSELF.
SO IF YOU THINK BACK TO THOSE RED LINES, THIS IS THE 100 FOOT LINE, THIS IS THE 125 FOOT LINE.
SO REALLY WHAT WE'RE ASKING IS FOR THE EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE PERMITTED AS IT SITS TODAY.
SO THAT EXISTING STRUCTURE IS A ONE STORY STRUCTURE.
IT WILL BE RENOVATED TO HAVE A STORY ADDED ON THE TOP, AND THEN THE ADDITION TO THE BUILDING IS IN THE REAR.
SO THE ADDITION IS ALL OUT OF THE 125 FOOT SETBACK.
IT'S REALLY TALKING ABOUT AUTHORIZING THIS LEGALLY NON-CONFORMING USE THAT SITS WHERE IT DOES CURRENTLY.
UM, AND THIS JUST SHOWS YOU THAT THE NEW PARKING AREA, SO YOU HAVE HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE SPACE IS COMING INTO THE BUILDING, UM, AND YOUR EXISTING VEGETATION AROUND.
AND YOU'LL SEE DOWN HERE ON THE SITE PLAN, THIS AREA HERE IS THE TREE LINE.
AND SO YOU'LL NOTE WE HAVE MADE A NOTE ON THE PLANS JUST IN RESPONSE TO THE STAFF REPORT, UM, WITH RESPECT TO THE LANDSCAPING.
SO THE LANDSCAPING, AND I'LL SHOW YOU A FEW PICTURES, IS GREAT.
IT'S EXISTING VEGETATION, IT'S MATURE, IT'S EVERGREEN, IT'S EVERYTHING THAT YOU WOULD WANT OUT OF AN ENTRANCE CORRIDOR BECAUSE YOU CANNOT SEE, AND I'LL SHOW YOU, YOU KNOW, IF YOU THINK ABOUT PATTERSON AVENUE HERE, THAT IS A 55 AND A HALF MILE AN HOUR STREET.
SO THIS JUST SHOWS YOU THE OVERLAY AGAIN, YOU HAVE, YOU HAVE VEGETATION ALL BOTH IN THE RIGHT OF WAY AND ON THE PROPERTY.
AND SO THAT WOULD ONLY BE SUPPLEMENTED, UM, AND TAKEN DOWN IF IT WERE DISEASED OR DEAD.
AND SO THAT'S PART OF THE OVERALL SITE PLAN PROCESS.
THIS JUST SHOWS YOU SOME IMAGES.
AGAIN, YOU CAN SEE THAT IT'S, IT'S EVERGREEN.
SO WE'RE ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE.
YOU CAN SEE THE EXISTING HOUSE.
SO THAT'S THE ONE THAT WILL REMAIN THE STRUCTURE OVER HERE, UM, IS THE ONE THAT'S RIGHT UP AGAINST THAT LOT LINE.
AND THAT WAS THE PARCEL THAT THEY, UH, RECENTLY ACQUIRED.
AGAIN, JUST SHOWING SOME IMAGES FROM THE MEDIAN JUST SO YOU CAN GET A A SENSE.
AND AGAIN, JUST TO THINK ABOUT THE, THE OVERLAY, UM, REQUIRES THE 125 FEET.
BUT IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE LANDSCAPING WITHIN IT, IT REQUIRES ONE LARGE DECIDUOUS TREE, EVERY 100 LINEAR FEET, TWO SMALL DECIDUOUS TREES EVERY 50 FEET.
SO WE HAVE ABOUT 580 LINEAR BEAT ON THE FRONTAGE.
SO WE ARE REALLY TALKING ABOUT FIVE LARGE TREES AND 10 SMALL TREES.
WHEREAS HERE YOU HAVE DENSE, EVERGREEN, MATURE, LARGE AND SMALL.
THAT WOULD ALL BE, UM, MAINTAINED AGAIN AND SUPPLEMENTED IF THEY WERE, UM, DEAD OR DISEASED.
THIS PIECE IS JUST FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES.
THESE, THE, JUST SO YOU CAN UNDERSTAND THE, AGAIN, THE FIRST FLOOR, UM, IS BEING RENOVATED, ADDING THE SECOND LEVEL AND THEN ADDING THE ADDITION ON, ON THE REAR OF THE BUILDING.
AND THAT, UM, IT'S ALL COMPLIANT WITH THE OVERLAY DISTRICT
[00:20:01]
MATERIALS DESIGN LIGHTING STANDARDS, UM, THAT I THINK COULD BE PERMITTED AND APPROVED WITH THE COA ADMINISTRATIVELY.SO IT'S REALLY JUST THE SETBACK PIECE THAT WE'RE HERE, UM, BECAUSE YOU ALL NEED TO AUTHORIZE THAT MODIFICATION.
UM, AGAIN, JUST TO SHOW YOU, IT'S AGAIN, JUST FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
THIS WILL BE FOR UM, A FINANCIAL SERVICES FIRM WHICH THEY OWN AND THAT WILL BE THEIR BUSINESS.
SO THEY ARE NOT ONLY GLAND RESIDENTS, BUT THEY'RE MOVING THEIR BUSINESS, UM, TO GLAND FROM HENRICO COUNTY.
UH, SO THIS IS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY NOT ONLY FOR OUR QUIET OFFICE, UH, BUSINESS THAT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY, UH, BUT IT REALLY FITS WITHIN THE OVERLAY DISTRICT.
'CAUSE THE BUILDING IS BEING REUSED WHERE IT IS CURRENTLY TODAY.
UM, SO WITH THAT, I THINK THAT THE, UM, THE COMPONENTS OF THE PLAN AS PRESENTED MEET THE REQUIREMENTS, UM, FOR THE WAIVER OF THE OVERLAY.
BUT I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE.
UM, AND RESPECTFULLY REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL OF THE COA.
IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN ON ONE OF THE SITE CLAIMS THAT I SAW, THERE WAS A, LIKE A DRAWING OF THE MONUMENT AT THE BIG AT THE ENTRANCE.
UM, IS THAT, THAT, WHERE'S THAT BE? RIGHT THERE.
AND SO IF YOU THINK ABOUT THE, LEMME GET BACK TO THE EXISTING IMAGE JUST COMING IN.
SO NO, I THINK IT'S PROBABLY ABOUT RIGHT THERE.
AND SO THAT WOULD HAVE TO MEET ALL OF THE MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS AS WELL.
YOU WANT YOUR MIND TO BE VISIBLE BECAUSE THE HOUSE CERTAINLY ISN'T CORRECT.
AND YOU KNOW, I THINK AGAIN, ONE OF THE, THE BENEFITS OF THE, THE USER ITSELF IS THAT UM, THERE'S NOT A HUGE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC COMING IN AND OUT OF THIS, UM, OFFICE BUILDING.
AND JUST TO CONFIRM, 'CAUSE I THINK, AND IN JOHN MICHAEL'S PRESENTATION, THE SETBACK IS AT THE A HUNDRED FEET IS AT THE FRONT OF THE PORCH.
THE PORCH DOESN'T PUSH IT FURTHER FORWARD.
SO THIS DOTTED LINE HERE IS YOUR A HUNDRED FOOT LINE, THIS IS THE UM, 125.
THE RED LINES WERE REALLY HELPFUL.
AND, AND THE PARKING LOT IS BETWEEN, PRIMARILY BETWEEN A HUNDRED AND HUNDRED 25 FOOT, IS THAT CORRECT? SO THIS IS THE FIRST HANDICAP SPACE HERE.
THIS IS AGAIN, THIS IS UM, IS THAT 75 OR THIS, THIS IS YOUR A HUNDRED FEET.
AND WHAT WAS THE JOHN YOU TALKED ABOUT 75 FEET LATE PARKING VISION.
CAN YOU JUST DO THAT AGAIN? YEAH.
SO IF THE PARKING WAS ABLE TO BE SHIFTED TO THE REAR OF THE BUILDING, IT WOULD ALLOW FOR 75 FEET AS A SETBACK.
BUT I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THEY'RE ABLE TO JUST WITH THE GEOMETRY OF THE LOTS HERE TO BE ABLE TO DO THAT, WHICH IS WHY THEY'RE PUTTING OUT ON THE SIDE, WHICH IS WHY THEY'RE HERE REQUESTING THE RELIEF.
BUT AGAIN, FROM A VISIBILITY STANDPOINT, YOU'RE COMING, THINKING ABOUT YOUR PATTERSON AVENUE GOING 55, YOU'RE NOT REALLY GONNA BE ABLE TO SEE UP THE DRIVEWAY.
AND FOR CLARIFICATION IS LIKE THE KIND OF UM, HEAVY PATTERN, IS THAT THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY? YES.
AND THEN THE LIGHTER SHADE UNDERNEATH IS WHAT THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ROAD ARE GONNA, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU.
LOOKS LIKE A NICE CLEAN DESIGNED BUILDING OFFICE BUILDING.
SO IT'S A, YOU CAN THANK JOHN FOR THAT
AND YOU SAID A LOT THAT DECIDED THAT'S JUST GOING, YOU JUST LEAVE THAT NATURAL OR THAT'S JUST NATURAL.
ANYTHING ELSE? UM, MORE QUESTION STAFF.
ANYTHING ELSE TO ADD APPLICANT? NO, I THINK IT LOOKS LIKE A GOOD COMPROMISE BECAUSE YOU KNOW, IF THEY WERE TO MAKE A HUGE INVESTMENT IN THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF THOSE PROPERTIES FALLS WAY OFF, YOU KNOW, THEY COULD PULL THE BUILDING UP ANOTHER 25 FEET CLOSER TO
[00:25:01]
THE ROAD, WHICH SOME COULD ARGUE WOULD BE LESS LIKELY.SO I THINK IT'S A GREAT USE FOR THE PROPERTY, THE WAY IT'S PROPOSED.
I THINK THE ADDITION IN THE BACK REALLY TAKES A LOT OF DISHES OFF THE TABLE AS WELL, SO.
UM, WELL DO YOU WANT TO APPROVE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR CLOSE THROUGH MS ANY FURTHER COMMENTS? CLOSING COMMENTS? GO AHEAD.
I'LL MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE APPLICATION FOR THE A MODIFICATION SET.
UM, JUST FOR THE RECORD, WE HAVE NO OLD BUSINESS AND NO OTHER.